Clean up the trash! My letter to the US EPA Administrator
January 21, 2015
Gina McCarthy,
I am writing to express my concern about the increasing
volume of trash and litter across our country and into our waterways, and I
would like to ask you to consider some new solutions to this age-old and
classic environmental issue.
Littering is not just a petty issue. Litter, including food packaging, Styrofoam,
cigarette butts, plastic water bottles, and more wash through rivers and into
lakes and the ocean causing damage to infrastructure, contamination of soil,
degradation of drinking water reservoirs, and a loss of aesthetics. Each year nearly 20,000 tons of trash washes
through the Anacostia River alone, located only a short distance from the EPA
headquarters in Washington, DC.
Of course, proper disposal of trash could potentially eliminate
most of this problem. Yet this
“solution” has come to no avail due to the difficulties of getting people not
to litter. The next time you go to a
grocery store, consider all of the disposal packaging used on food products,
most of which is not biodegradable and some of which leach toxic chemicals over
time. Also consider the challenges of
getting people to actually throw their trash away into a proper receptacle.
Perhaps it is time to address the issue of littering with a
different approach. Therefore, I would
like you to consider an incentive-based approach
to reducing litter by encouraging companies and consumers to purchase products
with biodegradable and reusable packaging.
The EPA could coordinate an effort to incentivize the use of biodegradable
packaging with monetary awards or tax breaks.
A few years ago, Sunchips® released bags that could be composted within
30 days. However, the noisiness of these
bags decreased sales of Sunchips®, and soon the company reverted back to
traditional disposal bags. This was unfortunate
because this could have prevented non-biodegradable litter from entering the
open environment. If the EPA could incentivize
all snack and chip producing companies to use biodegradable chip bags, then
perhaps the competition between noisy and non-noisy chip bags could be
eliminated (as well as non-biodegradable chip bag litter). This
is just one example of how I think the EPA could play a role in reducing the
impact of litter on our landscape.
The EPA could also consider coordinating or facilitating
programs that:
·
Provide a cheap and convenient way for consumers
to return packaging to the stores where they were purchased
·
Ban or strictly regulate certain types of
packaging (e.g. Styrofoam)
·
Public service announcements that encourage
people to reuse packaging (e.g. water bottles, shopping bags)
·
Rewards or tax breaks for companies (or communities)
that minimize or eliminate non-biodegradable or non-reusable packaging (e.g.
food manufacturers, fast food chains, grocery stores, etc.)
Solutions to solving our litter problem will require innovative,
“out-of-the-box” ideas as well as risks as we progress into the 21st
century with a world fast approaching 8 billion people. I hope you will consider tackling America’s
litter problem as a serious environmental and economic issue.
Thank you,
Alex Palmer
Chicago, IL
Comments
Post a Comment